Thursday, 13 November saw yet another judgment from the Dutch courts on the fate of the young female killer whale, “Morgan," who stranded on the Dutch coast in June 2010 and was rehabilitated by the group SOS Delfijn and employees from Dolfinarium Harderwijk. The animal was deemed unsuitable for release and was moved to live with a group of other killer whales at Loro Parque, Tenerife, Spain in November 2011.
Being a public broadcaster it would be hoped that the BBC would use a little bit more rigour when reporting issues particularly those that involve science. A case in point is an article in the Newsbeat strand written by reporter Talia Shadwell regarding research done on the mimicking behaviour of killer whales at an aquarium in France entitled: "Killer whale could be saying 'set me free'.
The article is very disappointing due to the obvious lack of research and which appear to be based on views from the animal rights groups The Born Free Foundation and Whale and Dolphin Conversation - both known for their objection to animals maintained in captive care.Further, there appears to be absolutely no effort to contact Marineland in France whose animals and facilities were used in the research cited or indeed any other zoos or aquarium that display whales or dolphins.
This limited study was conducted to present an overview of the findings and expert opinions on keeping, training and performance of sea lions in traveling circuses and the consequences for their health and welfare.
The
problem is - and as can be seen by the animal-rights lobbyists - that
no sooner is one claim, i.e. they (marine mammals) die young in
captivity is over turned another takes it places. The lobby groups just
keep changing the goal posts; it is a well known ploy which makes true
debate almost impossible as they are sadly fixed in their ideological
position
A recent published analysis of federal data by The Associated Press shows that
SeaWorld's annual survival rates for killer whales and some other marine
mammals are very much the same or better than their wild counterparts.
Yet,
it could be a way forward because despite films like 'The Cove' nothing
much has changed regarding drive hunts on a local level and animals are
still getting killed in large numbers.
On the 16 June 2013, The Sunday Times under the headline 'Stress drives captive whales to kill trainers'published yet another sadly predictable and partisan article regarding the care of cetaceans in captivity. The article focused primarily on the captive care of killer whales off the back of the recently released film "Blackfish" but also made more generalised comments on the welfare of cetaceans in captivity. One particularly irksome comment was the erroneous claim that Britain has banned zoos from keeping whales and dolphins.
Anyone who begins an article, which compares the slave trade
to animals in zoological collections, could be said to be allegedly as morally bankrupt as the suggestion
itself: also invoking Godwin's law with comments on Auschwitz are equally repugnant
but sadly a disappointing reflection on the calibre of the below cited article.
After several failed court actions in The Netherlands
to secure into custody the young stranded killer whale “Morgan” the future plans of the Orca Coalition and it animal-right
partners - such as the group The Black
Fish - have now become clear.
A 2012 survey reported in the UK’s The Guardian newspaper makes very interesting
reading on a number of levels. It was
reporting on a survey carried out by the animal-rights lobby group The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) in regards to the Japanese’s
attitude to whaling and the consumption of whale products. The poll was commissioned and undertaken by
the Nippon Research Centre - a total of 1,200 people were surveyed aged 15 to 79
across all geographical areas in the country.
The
survey found that 26.8% of people agreed with Japan's hunting of about 900
whales each year whilst 18.5% opposed the hunts - the rest were undecided. Of those polled 88.8% had not bought whale
meat in the past 12 months. The IFAW
tried hard to make a positive spin on this last statistic by declaring in a press briefing: "The people of Japan are taking whale meat off the
menu”. But as always this issue is far
more complex and the poll seems actually to suggest a total failure on the part
of the animal-rights and environmental lobby to persuade the Japanese to stop
hunting whales – which also should include the smaller cetaceans such as
dolphins.
The
question to be asked is why this has happened after years of lobbying and one
answer could be that the lobbyists, particularly the animal-rights groups, have
produced confusing and mixed messages not helped by a rabid opposition to
perhaps a huge and potential allay in the guise of the international zoological
display community.
Perhaps
one of the most insidious examples of misdirection by the lobbyists was the
“award winning” 2009 film The Cove.
Whilst certainly not the first to reveal the dolphin and whale drive
hunts in Japan, the film renewed and galvanise public opinion on the
matter.
However,
it did unfortunately spend a large amount of time side-tracking away from the
bloody killing of the dolphins and small whales driven into the cove to highlight the
small number of animals that escape death by being selected for sale to mainly
Asian aquariums and parks. Reviewing any
press release or web page produced by the many and various groups lobbying
against the drive hunt one could be forgiven to think that live-capture was the
primary objective of the hunt not food or “pest control” (as some local
fisherman have called it). This despite
many zoos and aquariums having made clear position statements against the hunts in the past.
It
is not, of course, any small chance that one of the primary movers and shakers
in the The Cove was former 1960’s dolphin trainer and now animal-rights
activist Ric O’Barry whose anti-captive agenda over-arched the film to such an
extent that the real tragedy of the hunting of these thousands of animals was a
foot-note to his (and the producers) erroneous claims that the objective driving
the slaughter was the “aquarium industry”. This despite the fact that the hunt has beenundertaken for hundreds of years with the
issue of acquiring animals for captive displays relatively a new phenomena only a
couple of decades old. Is it no wonder
that the central message - the bloody killing of thousands of animals - has become lost to the general public in Japan and elsewhere in pursuit of an anti-captive agenda by the animal-rights industry.
In
1992, the BBC Nature programme presented a programme featuring the whale hunts
and an investigation by the environmental group the The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA). They wanted to discover
what actually was happen to whale meat in Japan.
Their
conclusions were very different from the conclusion of the recent survey by
IFAW. They found that whale meat consumption was not
high but this was due to the sheer expense of the product with the general Japanese
public only consuming it in any quantities when it was place of special
offer. Perhaps more alarming was the
fate of the small whales and dolphins killed in the various drive fisheries
which their undercover investigation revealed were being sold as “whale meat”. During the course of the programme alternative
revenue generation and public education to the merits of cetaceans as living natural
resources was explored and the subject of whale watching was discussed. Interestingly, this included not only coastal
watching by boat but also the observation of animals with zoological collections
- a point now so vilified by operators and supporters of the animal-rights industry.
It
seems things really have not changed since the 1990’s for the animals killed
each year in drive hunts except for the few who may find their way into an aquarium
or zoo. It could be suggested that it would be a bit more logical if those who sincerely want to see an end to drive hunts should actually
focus on the realities of the issues rather than get side-tracked into the
personal agendas of a small but influential groups of animal-rights activist with personal
axes the grind regarding cetceans in captive care which if actually banned tomorrow wouldnot stop the drive hunt slaughter and could (by depriving
some people direct contact with animals in zoos and aquariums) take away one of the avenues of direct communication needed to make a difference to thousands of animal butchered annually
in Japan.
The Cove is the 2009 award-winning documentary exposing the annual drive fisheries hunt of dolphins and whales in the whaling village of Taiji, Wakayama, Japan.
Drive fisheries are not historically new and several countries aside from Japan also hunt (or have hunted) animals by this method such as the Solomon Islands, the Faeroe Islands and Peru. The drive fishery at Taiji is believed to have been in existence for more than 350 years. The Cove was actually not the first to document this controversial hunt which has been highlighted over the years by magazines such as the National Geographic and in the television series by the late Jacques-Yves Cousteau in the mid-1970s. Many have rightly been very concerned regarding these hunting methods and questioned both its operation on moral, ethical and animal welfare grounds.
However, one aspect of the film that has also proved to be controversial is that in recent years a percentage of animals from this fishery has not been killed but selected for live display in public aquaria and marine parks. In 2007 (the year The Cove was made) official figures show that 13,170 dolphins and whales were hunted and killed in Japan. Of that number 1,239 were hunted in by the drive fishery method and 90 (7.3%) removed alive for aquaria.
Between the years 2000-2013, a total of 19,092 small cetaceans were taken in the drive fishery at Taiji, Japan. 17,686 of those were slaughtered while 1,406 were taken as live-capture for sale to zoos and aquaria. Graph and data courtesy of Cetbase.
Unfortunately, the makers of the film have taken the position that suggested that this supply of animals to aquaria and parks was the prime purpose of the hunt and that if it ceased so would the hunt itself. This is not surprising as one of the main protagonists in The Cove is animal-rights activist Ric O'Barry who is stridently opposed to dolphins being held in the care of humans in zoological parks.
Moreover, the film suggests that animals from the hunt are being transported globally to countries such as the USA and that persons visiting these parks are in fact support the killing of dolphins and whales in Japan which is basically untrue. In fact, it should be noted that most of the popular cetaceans held in both the USA (and mainland Europe) are sustained via captive breeding and therefore these populations have no need to acquired animals via live capture operations from the wild. Animals from hunts such as Taiji are generally supplied to aquaria in Asia and the Middle-East and it has recently been alleged that 15 dolphins from a Japanese drive fishery have also been imported into Turkey in 2010.
The Cetabase web site has produced a contemporary map of global facilities that currently house animals derived for drive hunts HERE.
Further, several zoological collections and organisations involved in the captive care of marine animals have made clear statements against drive fishery hunts and consider them inhumane.
Only one drive-fishery animal has until recently been held in the USA. It is a false-killer whale called Kina originally imported by the US Navy's Marine Mammal Program from Ocean Park, Hong Kong in 1987; it was transferred to the Hawaiian Institute of Marine Biology in 2000. This animal was used for research and was not on general public display. In September 2015 Kina and her two bottlenose dolphin companions were transferred to SeaLife Park in Hawaii. Studies on these animals echolocation and biosonar abilities will continue at the park in partnership with the University of Hawaii. Kina died at Sea Life Park in October 2019. An attempt to import false killer whales to a US marine park acquired from a drive fishery in 1993 was blocked by the National Marine Fisheries Service as they considered such operations inhumane which has effectively banned further imports of animals into the USA from drive fisheries.
Animal rights supporters elsewhere have also cited that Sea World in California was granted an import permit for a captive pilot whale from a Japanese aquarium which joined its current group of pilot whales at San Diego on in 2012. It should be pointed out that this animal is an alone stranded animal that was rescued in January 2004 and is deemed unsuitable for release. It should be noted that this animal was not acquired by deliberate capture nor from a drive fishery.
The two facts anyone who watches The Cove should remember are:
(a) that
the drive-fishery in Japan prime motive is 'pest control' and food as the
animals are perceived to be in competition with fisherman and that the hunt
has been undertaken for hundreds of years and animals for zoos and aquaria
are a recent development and the numbers taken are small and if this stopped
sadly the hunt would still continue;
(b) that no animals have been imported into the mainland Europe since 1980
and in the US since 1989 from any drive-fishery; the majority of animals
displayed in these locations have come from captive breeding programs.
***
Below a two-part video commentary on the inaccurate statements made by Richard O'Barry and others regarding the Japanese drive fishery and captive cetaceans in aquaria outside Asia and the Middle-East.
On 23 June
2010 a young killer whale was reported to be swimming in the Dutch Wadden
Sea; a rare event for this species with the last stranding in Dutch
waters in 1963.
Some interesting
information from the North Atlantic Killer Whale ID Project HERE.
The animal
was monitored and it became clear the animal was in some distress and
with the permission of the Dutch government the cetacean rescue
foundation
SOS Delfijn and employees from Dolfinarium
Harderwijk rescued the animal and took it to a temporary holding
pool at Harderwijk for assessment and treatment.